The Taming of the Shrew

or

Love’s Labour’s Lost

 

Introduction:

The performance proper began  in the summer of 2001 – when 18 characters of different kinds of temperament and  nature gathered in the august surroundings of Gymnasium Borbeck to be part of the play. Some had just returned from the New World with obvious abnormalities of pronunciation that it was hard to integrate them into the team and to teach them standard diction.

Plot:

The play tells the story of 18 (in the course of the play 2 actors changed the set)  young people of various  nationalities  in their permanent struggle for  academy awards ( certificates) in both bilingual English and history that should – after a  climax of  controversial dialogues  (though some preferred extensive  soliloquies) – open them all doors to  stages worldwide.

It contributed to the dramatic effect that there were theatrical  exchanges absolutely ready for the stage between male and female, talkative and quiet, compassionate and complacent, dry and funny characters which made sure that the single acts and scenes ( here: lessons) were never boring, just the opposite: they were nerve-racking and made many demands on both stage director (here: teacher) and actors ( here: students).

The confrontation of the rival groups ( participants and non- participants= objectors  of the lessons) sometimes  culminated in aggressive verbal exchanges, withdrawal of affection or even treatment with contempt. This sometimes stretched the stage director too far – it has to be admitted –  and  she could only try to do her best, that meant to save the situation with some extra-ordinary interludes (here: stories, dinners, excursions ..).

The play ended , good gracious, not in a catastrophe but in common  conciliation with joyous celebrations as all the characters involved simply were keen on leaving the stage after such hard times being granted  good reviews  as a reward for their never-ending engagement, ready and well prepared for  a promising  further stage career.

Cast: actresses and actors of the 2003 performance:

As for data (or datta) protection the names remain unknown but recognizable for those who know the scene.

Nice-looking ladies but quiet as grave. Difficult to handle and a problem for each performance as they could if they would!  Mistresses of the passive participation (back stage career?)…

Another  group of nice ladies – also quiet but more  willing. Less problematic for the stage director. Some should  join the writing business as their adaptations of common issues are brilliant..

Two extremely sophisticated ladies –”shrews ”? but no case for taming. Promising future! Could improve their theatrical effectiveness.

One lady in permanent opposition (antagonist?) – especially with regard to the climatic conditions on and behind the stage and permanently defending  the rights of the other members of the cast. Difficulties with her scenes  due to an uncompromising  schedule.

One lady of great eloquence (after some pronunciation regulations) and the prohibition to say more than the script allows. But she is on the right track.

One more lady – whose mind was often elsewhere and who had to be reminded of her part in the play. Finally she found a private prompter…

A gentleman with an exuberant self-confidence and who always tried to break the rules and speak a different text with his innate sense of dramatization.

One gentleman whose main idea it was to have his own fun diverging from the script or the stage directions and who sometimes spoilt the play by his food excesses.

Another gentleman with a cute knowledge of the cinema business, could have been more involved in our play but good  backstage observer.

And finally one gentleman  with varying  interest but sometimes strange even striking views, Theatrically very effective, esp. his peculiar pronunciation and  diction.

 

Though it was sometimes very difficult for the stage director to accommodate everything and everyone it was a good time and this play  will be unforgettable. We managed it quite well.

Now it is time to take our last curtain call:

 

All’s well that ends well

(I’ll miss you and I mean it)

Essen, February 2003 

Ulla Westphal,  English and history teacher  as well as stage director (politically incorrect)